Olympias wrote:
maknews you identify an ethnos only from the language factor. You ignore or you want to do, the major factors of the Biopolitics. The two major factors of the ethnos formation are Descent and the Consciousness. Both should coexist in the formation of a ethnos. When two branches of the same ethnos have lived for a long time in different places or under different conditions, then it is natural for them, in spite of the resamplance of their characters, to have developed distinct memories and a different history, and perhaps even separate language and civilisation: they would form thus distinct nations despite their racial identity. Heterogeneous people with pseudo-national consciousness may regard religion (Islam for example), language (such as Panslavism), or coexistence (for instance, the USSR, Yugoslavia) as factors making them a "Nation" or "Ethnos". One other example is your State that try to prove its continuity from the past into the present when generically and Bio-politically is known that you have Slavonic Descent.
Vlach-speakers, Arvanite-speakers and dopie-speakers have common Consciousness with the Greek-speakers and they had proved by fighting in the past and in the present the other common speakers that had Different Consciousness .This is the reason that I said that the Modern Greek nation (in the beginning) was not "a community of citizens " but a "cultural group".
I have heared you many times to say the Turkish-speakers that came from Minor Asia and bla-bla. For your information was only 60.000 people with full of Greek Consciousness.Actually this was the reason that expelled from the Turks.
Genetics and Anthopology has prooved the continuity of the Greek nation from the ancient into the present.Biopolitics reject genetics as factor to determine a "ethnos" when accept the athropolgy.
Olympias
How am I going to unravel this? The massive underlying assumption to what you just said is 'racial continuity'.
You presuppose that two people with clearly distinctive cultural marks are of the same 'ethnos'. The Pontians were clearly culturally, linguistically and religiously, nothing like the new mainland Greek, and yet they are 'of the same ethnos'. Figure? How? You also say that 'consciousness' is important in 'ethnos'. Well, Pontians never saw themselves much like the new mainland Greeks. Even the new langauge of Greece, was completely alien and foriegn to them.
You see that is the problem. Your 'consciousness' is not hereditary. It has been constructed for you and imposed on you. Now you are imposing it on history - on the history of people such as the Pontians, and Macedonians that represent a kind of counter-discourse - to the official truth of the State power structure. The State uses techniques, such as education, among other things, to get its idea of what ''it'' stands for, of what ''it'' represents, across to its diverse citizens. The Aegean was colonised by an 'idea' that was conceptualised in Western Europe about 200 years ago, an 'idea' of what Greece should be - and the State has been trying to live up to it ever since - it still is. Shite, someone has to fight that power structure.
There is nothing authentic about it - your a product of the State - your State has to deny the true natives of Greece - to make sure you can sleep better at night knowing that know one was there before you - right? sheez....