Macedonia Forum • View topic

The Anomaly · **Posted:** 15 Nov 2007 23:08

Look SoM, stop giving me a hard time with the Bulgars being Slavs theory. I will be happy to reject any of my theories when I find them wrong and I have rejected hundred of theories which I was convinced were 100% true. The above theory is only an optional theory which cannot be ruled out. These theories are a problem because of just that: their theories. At least the Slavic migration not being possible is a fact and it is easy to defend this fact. A theory cannot be refuted when there are no facts to refute it. When I believed in the Slavic theory of Bulgar origin I did no know about the Scythian Empire nor about the Iranic inscriptions. Now that I do I'm searching for more of these facts and then I'll see what theory turns out to be right. I do not claim any of them to be right.

So don't argue about it with me, ok?

Magedon · **Joined:** 05 Oct 2006 18:44 **Posts:** 256

Slovak i agree with you - we were having the same discussion here with some friends who are in these things - and we all concluded that Atila and the Huns were infact Skiti and yes they were not a single nation, but rather like modern slavic ppls divided in smaller nations - And Scots are definitly desendants of them too look at the name its the same - Skiti - Skoti.

And dont forget that Slavic is an Aryan language too very close with Sanskrit, and while the meaning 'gentleman' may developed as nominal meaning later, dont forget that Arians were the first agricultural ppl, they invented the plow, (like Macedonians are) and the root of the word cud well be - AR RIE or the one who RIE the AR or plows the eARth. Perfect Macedonian root describing in detail the nature of those ppl.

The Anomaly · **Posted:** 01 Dec 2007 11:31

Magedon, you were not here for a while, so you should check out this post:
http://www.maknews.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4563

Magedon · **Joined:** 05 Oct 2006 18:44 **Posts:** 256

So you r telling me that the words Rie Ar dont means plowing the eARth>Is that it??

The Anomaly · **Posted:** 01 Dec 2007 14:50

I'm saying that it is enough with searching for word roots as they do not help us in any practical way. If you want to research roots of Indo-European languages then I can send you Panini's Dhatu Patha where all the roots are listed.

Paul · **Posted:** 03 Dec 2007 03:40

Slovák wrote:

Yes, as I said it is a suffix, not part of the root. In Slavic it us used to represent what does one do or where he lives. The name of the Hungarians is Magyars which derives from mag the same root from which magic derives. The nations of Estonians and Finns which are the closest to Magyars in Old Slavic documents and tales are called Čudi meaning miracle-workers from čud - miracle.
Similar can be said about Tatars from tat - horse, and Turks from tur - ox, bull, Shqipetar from shqip - rocky mountain.
Bulgar if I remember correctly derives from bulga or volga which means great river, or is it bright river. Can't remember right now.
However, Avar derives from the word Hebar - Hebrew and the Avar title Kagan from Hebrew Kohen. Not far from where I live archaeologists found an Avar necropolis and many Hebraic symbols. I saw them myself in the museum of Novi Sad.
In Slavic Avar means giant - obor.

Does Magic derive from Mag as in Magyar ?

What about -

Magare
Magla

I'm sure there are more.

maknews · **Posted:** 03 Dec 2007 04:15

Magic and magla are particularly interesting, if you think about it.

AR

Who is online