osiris wrote:
...
comparing hitler and stalin with alexandar and taking anyone outside of their historical context and applying your societies moral values to their actions is wrong.
The comparisons I made between various emperors are based on the criteria that you've applied in your previous posts - not on my criteria.
Speaking of taking things outside of their historical context and applying your society's moral values to their actions:
Quote:
.. you were happy to suggest aristotle the hellenic racist as a great macedonian, and not alexandar who demonstrated respect and tolerance for all his subject cultures.
Where is the evidence that Hellenism was a 'race' in ancient times? And how was 'Aristotle' any more of a 'racist' than Alexander? Please quote anything from Aristotle to support the assertion that he was a "Hellenic RACIST".
And what is your definition of 'respect and tolerance for all his subject cultures"? Something like the "respect and tolerance" you might have for different breeds of pets that you might 'subject'?
Your comments about me taking things out of their historic context are clearly misplaced. In my previous posts, I have made it known that my ratings about how great any historical Macedonian figures are partly based on how relevant their legacy is to contemporary society, and particularly to the ongoing Macedonian struggle for freedom and justice. Since this poll has been started without a predetermined criteria for greatness, I have obviously adopted my own criteria, as have you. By your criteria, Alexander is no doubt greater than Delcev. And by mine, it's the other way around. Alexander was no doubt a great conqueror and ruler, especially judging by the standards of his time. Delcev, on the other hand, encouraged moral and intellectual freedom, including rebellion against all RULERS, and embarked on that course against great odds, without having inherited a formidable military force or kingdom; without the benefit of an education and military training ensured by somebody of the calibre of King Philip II (a greater Macedonian than Alexander, IMO), and without a tutor like Aristotle, who is perhaps the greatest scientist and philosophers of the ancient world and one of the greatest of all time. Delcev would be a great human being by the standards of any civilized era that I can think of. His ideas, ethical values, leadership qualities and demonstrated strength of character could be extraordinarily useful in any modern society's struggle against injustice and oppression. And it is highly likely that were it not for the foundations set by him and a few others like him, Macedonian nationhood and sovereignty would not exist as a plausible concept today.
Quote:
alexandars impact on history was not just the establishment of his empire and its subsequent collapse after his death. there were far reaching intellectual cultural and economic and dare i say it moral consequences of alexandars actions.
What exactly were those consequences? How do you trace them to Alexander as the source? Are you sure you are not confusing them with Aristotle's foundational contributions?
Quote:
the macedonians peoples struggle for their identity is not something i am belittling, i am merely pointing out the failings of vmro, and i accept its only with hindsight i can make such claims, but my defintion of greatness is not merely based on intent and the upholding of modern values but on the impact of ones actions on history.
If you are going to assess consequences independently of intent, you might say that Hitler is the greatest modern leader, given that the establishment of the United Nations, the United Nations Charter and the Universal Declaration on Human Rights, and the overall "New World Order", was almost a direct consequence of his work.