|
Greek Atrocities in Macedonia
Part 1
- Introduction
By Risto Stefov
May, 2005
rstefov@hotmail.com
Part
1 | Part
2 | Part
3 | Part
4 | Part
5 | Part 6
"When will the Greek State apologize to the
Macedonian people for its 1912-1913 genocide in Northern Greece?"
"Ethnic cleansing" may be a modern term but its meaning
is well understood by the Macedonian people living in northern
Greece. Ever since Greece took possession of Macedonia, in the
early 20th century, Macedonian people have experienced first hand
ethnic cleansing.
This series of articles will present evidence of atrocities perpetrated
by the Greek State against the innocent Macedonian civilian populations
prior to, during and after the Balkan wars. Most of the information
contained in the articles is obtained from the 1913 Carnegie Inquiry
and from Greek sources.
The Carnegie Endowment was founded in 1910 by Andrew Carnegie
to promote peace and understanding in the world. Its prime objectives
are to do research, promote discussions, sponsor publications and
education in international affairs and American foreign policy.
When war broke out in the Balkans in 1912 and 1913, the Carnegie
Endowment dispatched a commission on a fact finding mission. The
mission consisted of seven prominent members from the United States,
Britain, France, Germany, Austria-Hungary and Russia. Among them
was the distinguished journalist Henry N. Brailsford, author of
the book "Macedonia its Races and their Future".
The commission was dispatched from Paris on August 2nd, 1913,
shortly before the end of the second Balkan war and returned to
Paris nearly eight weeks later, on September 28th. In spite of
opposition from the Greek government, the commission arrived in
time to witness much of the war's aftermath and record most accounts
while they were still fresh in people's minds. The commission's
findings were compiled and released in 1914.
In a statement dated February 22, 1914, Carnegie Endowment Acting
Director Nicholas Murray Butler said:
"The circumstances which attended the Balkan wars of 1912
and 1913 were of such character as to fix upon them the attention
of the civilized world. The conflicting reports as to what actually
occurred before and during these wars, together with the persistent
rumors often supported by specific and detailed statements as to
violations of the laws of war by the several combatants, made it
important that an impartial and exhaustive examination should be
made of this entire episode in contemporary history. The purpose
of such an impartial examination by an independent authority was
to inform public opinion and to make plain just what is or may
be involved in an international war carried on under modern conditions.
If the minds of men can be turned even for a short time away from
passion, from race antagonism and from national aggrandizement
to a contemplation of the individual and national losses due to
war and to the shocking horrors which modern warfare entails, a
step and by no means a short one, will have been taken toward the
substitution of justice for force in the settlement of international
differences.
It was with this motive and for this purpose that the Division
of Intercourse and Education of the Carnegie Endowment for International
Peace Constituted in July, 1913, an International Commission of
Inquiry to study the recent Balkan wars and to visit the actual
scenes where fighting had taken place and the territory which had
been devastated. The presidency of this International Commission
of Inquiry was entrusted to Baron d'Estournelles de Constant, Senator
of France, who had represented his country at the First and Second
Hague Conferences of 1899 and of 1907, and who as President Fondateur
of the Conciliation lnternationale, has labored so long and so
effectively to bring the various nations of the world into closer
and more sympathetic relations. With Baron d'Estournelles de Constant
there were associated men of the highest standing, representing
different nationalities, who were able to bring to this important
task large experience and broad sympathy.
The result of the work of the International Commission of Inquiry
is contained in the following report. This report, which has been
written without prejudice and without partisanship, is respectfully
commended to the attention of the governments, the people and the
press of the civilized world. To those who so generously participated
in its preparation as members of the International Commission of
Inquiry, the Trustees of the Carnegie Endowment for International
Peace offer an expression of grateful thanks." (Preface)
It is therefore our wish to highlight some of the Commission's
findings in a series of articles and remind the world of the plight
of the Macedonian people and the indignity they suffered at the
hands of the Greek State.
The failed 1903 Ilinden Macedonian uprising against the Ottoman
regime not only took away the hope for independence and self-rule
but at the same time brought devastation and destruction. Many
Macedonians lost their lives, properties and all hopes for freedom.
While the Macedonian spirit for self-liberation was slowly extinguished
by Turkish brutality, there was new hope on the horizon, the hope
that Macedonia would be liberated by her Christian brothers Greece,
Bulgaria and Serbia. Many leading Macedonians, including Krste
Misirkov, warned against such false hopes, but most Macedonians,
fed up with their intolerable living conditions, could not see
the danger. Mesmerized by slick propaganda, they were more than
ready to welcome their liberators.
Greece, Bulgaria and Serbia, on the other hand, while priming
the Macedonian people and the world with their propaganda for liberation,
were actually planning for an invasion with intentions of occupying
and partitioning Macedonia. The Great Powers were well aware of
this sinister plan even before it was put into action.
Here is evidence that the Macedonian people were duped by their
Christian brothers, Greece, Bulgaria and Serbia. According to the
Carnegie inquiries, the Macedonian revolutionaries themselves,
at first, rejoiced with an outburst of popular gratitude towards
their liberators. In a "proclamation to their brothers",
published by the delegates of the twenty-five Macedonian Confederacies,
at the very beginning of the first Balkan war, declared to the
Macedonian population:
"Brothers:-your sufferings and your pains have touched the
heart of your kindred. Moved by the sacred duty of fraternal compassion,
they come to your aid to free you from the Turkish yoke. In return
for their sacrifice they desire nothing but to reestablish peace
and order in the land of our birth. Come to meet these brave knights
of freedom therefore with triumphal crowns. Cover the way before
their feet with flowers and glory. And be magnanimous to those
who yesterday were your masters. As true Christians, give them
not evil for evil. Long live liberty! Long live the brave army
of liberation!" (Page 50).
In fact the Serbian army entered Macedonia from the north and
the Greek army from the south, welcomed with cries of joy from
the Macedonian population. Unfortunately this enthusiasm for the
liberators soon gave way to doubts, then to disenchantment and
was finally converted to hatred and despair.
According to the Carnegie report, the Macedonians were not the
only ones duped. The soldiers of the invading armies were lied
to also. "The Servian soldier, like the Greek, was firmly
persuaded that in Macedonia he would find compatriots, men who
could speak his language and address him with jivio or zito. He
found men speaking a language different from his, who cried hourrah!
He misunderstood or did not understand at all. The theory he had
learned from youth of the existence of a Servian Macedonia and
a Greek Macedonia naturally suffered; but his patriotic conviction
that Macedonia must become Greek or Servian, if not so already,
remained unaffected. Doubtless Macedonia had been what he wanted
it to become in those times of Douchan the Strong or the Byzantine
Emperors. It was only agitators and propagandist Bulgarians who
instilled into the population the idea of being Bulgarian. The
agitators must be driven out of the country, and it would again
become what it had always been, Servian or Greek.
Accordingly they acted on this basis.
Who were these agitators who had made the people forget the Greek
and Servian tongues?
First, they were the priests; then the schoolmasters; lastly the
revolutionary elements who, under the ancient regime, had formed
an 'organization'; heads of bands and their members, peasants who
had supplied them with money or food, -in a word the whole of the
male population." (Page 50-51)
In other words, to a Greek, Bulgarian or Serbian soldier, if a
person was not of his nationality as he had been taught back home,
then this person was the enemy and in Macedonia, the entire Macedonian
population was the enemy.
No sooner had the invading armies consolidated their hold on Macedonia,
than they arrested and punished all Macedonians regarded as leaders
and venerated as heroes by the population, while the dregs, the
very men who caused much suffering, were raised to greatness.
Progressive disintegration of social and national life in Macedonia
began with the entry of the occupying Greek, Bulgarian and Serbian
armies and has not ceased to this day (in Greece and Bulgaria).
All three States, Greece, Bulgaria and Serbia committed atrocities
against the Macedonian people during the 1912 and 1913 Balkan wars.
However, for the purpose of this series of articles, the focus
of investigation will be on the Greeks.
Still in the midst of excitement, the first Balkan war was accepted
by European opinion as a war of Liberation. In the European mind,
its conclusion meant the downfall of the Ottoman regime in Europe
and the end of all oppression. Unfortunately, European understanding
of the Macedonian situation was far from reality as one tyrant
was replaced by three. While the Ottoman regime tolerated the various
religions, languages and traditions of all races in their Empire,
the new tyrants did not. As soon as they consolidated their hold
on Macedonia, they began to act on its population.
First came the evictions.
The first ones to be thrown out were the Muslim Macedonians. Even
though they spoke the Macedonian language and insisted that they
were Macedonians and not Turks, their captors relentlessly cast
them out. For no reason other than being Muslim, they were evicted
from their homes and forced out from their ancestral lands.
After the Turkish authorities vacated Macedonia, all that was
left were civilians. No Turk dared remain behind knowing what awaited
him. So the Turkish villages that the Carnegie report was referring
to were in fact Macedonian villages inhabited by Muslim Macedonians.
After the Greek army occupied his town, according to Hadji Suleiman
Effendi of Strumnitsa "They subsequently gave the order that
the Moslems must abandon the town; and added that they, the Greeks,
would burn the houses if the Moslems would not. I myself offered
3 pounds to the Greek patrol which came to burn down my house.
The sergeant refused to take it, and said that if he did not burn
the house another patrol would. The buildings were all systematically
burnt, and the same thing was done in about thirty-two neighbouring
villages. 'We [pointing to the others that were present] were all
large farmers, employing, each of us, nearly 300 laborers and tenants;
now we have nothing'." (Page 278)
The Carnegie Commission visited the camp of the Muslim refugees
outside of Solun and spoke with refugees from Strumitsa who, among
other things, reported that most Muslims left their town, most
under pressure. The few that remained were evicted by force. "They
heard that other villages had been burned after they left and some
of them actually saw their villages in flames. They had received
no rations from the Greeks for four days; they had no plans for
the future, did not wish to go Asia, nor yet to settle in Greek
territory. They saw 'no good in front of them at all'." (Page
278)
Officials of the Comite Islamique, in Solun, informed the Carnegie
Commission that by September 1, 1913, there were 135,000 Muslim
refugees in and around Solun. Most of them had arrived after the
conclusion of the second Balkan war. The Committee reminded the
Greek government that it was responsible for these refugees since
it evicted them from their homes. The Committee, which at this
point was spending 50 pounds of its own money daily on bread to
feed the refugees, had no faith that the Greek government would
in any way help to relieve the situation. (Page 278)
In a separate account, according to Ali Riza Effendi of Kukush,
the Greeks systematically and deliberately plundered and burnt
the town. Many old people were burned alive in their homes. (Page
279)
A Muslim Notable from Yailadjik, a village one and a half hours'
distance from Solun stated that on November 11, 1912, Greek soldiers
came and killed fifteen Muslims. They then took all the furniture,
9,500 sheep and goats, 1,500 cattle and all the grain which they
could find, and then burned the 250 houses of the village. (Page
281)
The following is a report drawn up by the Moslem community of
Pravishta, on the atrocities committed in that town and the neighboring
villages since the withdrawal of the Turkish authorities on October
24, 1913.
[NOTE.-The names of all of the killed (195 in all) and of some
of those robbed, and also those of the aggressors, are fully given
in the original Turkish document, but are omitted in the following
summarized translation].
Village of Giran
Twenty-one Moslems killed by the Greeks of the village of Nikchan,
and a sum of about £T3,000 stolen. Six hundred goats were
also stolen for the benefit of the Greek church at Nikchan and
2,400 goats taken by the Greeks of Djerbelan.
Village of Palihor
Six Moslems killed by the band commanded by Demosthenes, headmaster
of the Greek school of Palihor, pillage to the extent of about £T3,000.
One woman (named) was violated by Demosthenes and another.
Village of Micheli
Demosthenes and other Greeks pillaged the village, carried off
many oxen and much corn and stole credit notes for a sum of £T3,000.
Village of Drama
Two Moslems killed by Greeks of Pravishta.
Village of Osmanli
Six Moslems killed by Greeks of Holo; about £T1,500 stolen.
Village of Samalcol
Twenty-one Moslems of this village were taken by Miltiades Machopoulos
of the band of Myriacos Mihail to the ravine of Casroub, where
they were massacred by the Greek bandit Leonidas and others. Over £T1,500
were stolen from them; a shop looted of stock worth £Tl,500,
and about £T7,000 stolen in the village generally.
Village of Tchanahli
Two Moslems killed by Greeks of Holo; 200 sheep and a mule stolen.
Village of Mouchtian
Twenty-five Moslems killed by Myriacos Mihail, his band and some
local Greeks in the ravine of Casroub. About £T3,000 stolen.
"In the twentieth century of progress, the skeletons which
may still be seen in this ravine, present to the eyes of Justice
a monument capable of enlightening her regarding Hellenic civilization." (Page
282).
Village of Dranich.
£T2,000 in money, seven goats and 1,000 sheep stolen by
the Greeks of Palihor and Nikchan.
Village of Ahadler
Nine Moslems killed by Greeks of Casroub, and sums amounting to £T258
stolen.
Village of Tchiflik
Ten Moslems killed by the same Greeks of Casroub, and about £TI,000
stolen.
Village of Pethor
Fourteen Moslems killed by the grocer Myriacos Mihail, member
of the bishop's council, Panahi, priest of Boblan, and Miltiades
Machopoulos. [The band led by these three men is frequently mentioned.]
Local Greeks stole about £T1,500.
Village of Rehemli
Three Moslems killed by Greeks of Holo.
Village of Sarili
Five Moslems killed by Greeks of Pethor, and about 1,000 sheep
and goats stolen.
Village of Dedebal
Eight Moslems killed by Myriacos Mihail and his band; about £T1,000
stolen.
Village of Deranli
Three Moslems killed by Myriacos Mihail and his band; about £T3,000
stolen.
Village of Orphano
Three Moslems killed by the Greeks. One of these was seized by
the priest Panahi on a telephonic order from the Greek bishop of
Pravishta and killed at Essirli. The bishop had had the telephone
removed from the Turkish governor's office to his own house, and
by this means he gave orders to the whole district.
Village of Boblan
Eight Moslems killed by Myriacos Mihail and his band, specially
sent for the purpose by the bishop; about £T800 stolen.
Village of Carpan
Four Moslems killed by the band of Myriacos Mihail sent by the
bishop. The Greeks of Carpan stole all the goods and corn belonging
to the local Moslems, and did not leave them even the grain which
they had in their household jars. The Greek bravoes brutally robbed
the women of their earrings. Later Greek soldiers joined the villagers
and began to violate the young women, until they were obliged to
take refuge in the towns and villages held by Bulgarian troops.
About £T500 was stolen in this village.
Village of Leftera
Four Moslems killed by Greeks. The wife of Arnaut Agouchagha,
who voluntarily embraced Islam fifty years ago, was taken to Pravishta
to be reconverted to Christianity. She told the Bulgarian chief,
Baptchev, that she did not consent to this conversion. Baptchev
had her released, but on her return to the village she was "odiously
lynched by Greek savages".
Baptchev took £T500 from a Turk at the instigation of the
Greek priests of the monastery of Nozlé, who also robbed
the villagers of about 2,000 sheep.
Village of Kochkar
Two Moslems killed by Greeks of Drazeni and about £Tl,000
stolen.
Village of Kale Tchiflik
Five Moslems killed, and all the cattle seized by the priests
of Nozlé.
Village of Devekeran
Four Moslems killed by Greeks of Pravishta; about £T500
stolen.
Village of Essirli
Nineteen Moslems killed in the ravine of Casroub by Greeks of
that village. About £T1,500 stolen.
Village of Kotchan
One Moslem killed to satisfy the vengeance of the bishop and of
the priest Nicholas.
"It is worthy of remark that many Imams figure among the
list of victims in the district of Pravishta * * * further that
the victims are almost always men known for their enlightenment.
* * * The reason why the assassins killed Imams and the most enlightened
notables for choice is obvious when one reflects that there are
.13,000 Moslems in this district out of a total population of 20,000." (Page
283)
Town of Pravishta
Ten Moslems were killed, including one woman, while the town was
held by Bulgarian bands, under the command of a chief named Baptchev,
who established himself in the governor's palace and acted as governor
and commandant. They were killed by three Greeks (named) and the
Bulgarians. On the evening when an assassination was to take place,
the students of the Greek school assembled in the courtyard of
the government house and sang the Greek national anthem.
The Greek bishop formed a municipal council composed of the priest
Nicholas, the grocer Myriacos Mihail, and others (named). The sentence
of death was passed by this council, approved by the archbishop,
and communicated to Baptchev to be carried out. Similar councils
were formed in the villages which took their orders from that of
Pravishta. The Bulgarian, chief Baptchev served as the tool of
the Greek bishop and notables. In this town the Moslem population
has incurred a loss of about £T3,000, stolen by the Bulgarian
bands, guided by the Greeks.
The daughter of the commander of the gendarmeries, Suleiman Effendi,
who is now in Constantinople, was summoned one night to the bishopric
to be converted to Christianity, The bishop threatened her, in
order to convert her, but the Bulgarian chief Baptchev, when he
heard of this, went to the bishopric, saved the girl, restored
her to her family, and thus prevented her conversion. Some days
later he gave her a passport to go to Constantinople.
Thanks to the orders issued by Baptchev the mosques of the town
and the villages were preserved intact, and no one was molested
on account of his religion.
Neither the Bulgarian officers, nor their soldiers nor even the
members of the bands committed any violence against women, but
Baptchev took money to the value of about £T6,000
The priest Panahi of the village of Nikchan and the Greek antiquarian
Apostol, of the village of Palihor, who disapproved of the unworthy
conduct of the bishop, were killed by his orders. The Bulgarian
authorities after a careful inquiry were convinced of the bishop's
guilt. The bodies of the victims of the town of Pravishta are still
in the ravine of Cainardja, at the place called Kavala Bachi.
We certify that this report is in complete agreement with the
registers of the Moslem community of Pravishta and true in all
its details.
[Seal.]
Moslem Community of the Caza of Pravishta, 1331.
To be continued...
If this were not so tragic, it would be comical;
According to Serbian statistics compiled in 1889 by Gopcevic,
57,600 Bulgarians, 201,140 Greeks, 2,048,320 Serbians and 0 Macedonians
lived in Macedonia.
According to Bulgarian statistics compiled in 1900 by Kantched,
1,181,336 Bulgarians, 228,702 Greeks, 700 Serbians and 0 Macedonians
lived in Macedonia.
According to Greek statistics compiled in 1904 by Deliani, 336,017
Bulgarians, 652,795 Greeks, no figure was given for Serbians and
0 Macedonians lived in Macedonia.
Where did they get such numbers?
One can only make such claims about Macedonia and get-away with
it. Try and tell a Frenchman or an Englishman that 0 French live
in France or 0 English live in England and see how far you get!
Leave it to the Greeks, Bulgarians and Serbians to make fools
of themselves.
References:
George F. Kennan. "The Other Balkan Wars" A 1913 Carnegie
Endowment Inquiry in Retrospect with a New Introduction and Reflections
on the Present Conflict. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment For
International Peace, 1993.
For comments regarding this article contact the author at rstefov@hotmail.com

Top
|